Originally published in 2025. Updated and source-checked on 22 October 2026. Reading time: 4 minutes.
AI can help a marketing team draft, organise and analyse information. The value depends on the task, the inputs and the checks around the output. Producing more material is useful only if it helps the business communicate more clearly or make a better decision.
For MACO, the starting point is the business question: what needs to improve, and how will we know whether the use of AI helped?
Begin with a task you can evaluate
A practical first use might be preparing alternative headlines from an approved brief, organising public research for review or summarising non-confidential meeting notes. Keep the scope narrow enough that someone can assess the result.
Compare the AI-assisted process with the existing approach. Include preparation, checking and correction time in the comparison. A fast first draft is not necessarily a faster finished piece.
Give the work a clear strategic brief
Before generating content, define the audience, the offer, the customer’s question and the evidence you can use. Include examples of language that reflects the brand. Specify which claims must not be made.
For an expertise-led business, useful content should make the expertise easier to understand. Generic claims about innovation or transformation do little to explain the specific value of the service.
Check claims at their source
NIST’s Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile identifies confabulation, data privacy and information integrity among the risks associated with generative AI. A fluent answer can contain incorrect facts or unsupported references.
Before publishing, open the original source for each statistic, quotation and factual assertion. Check what was measured, when, in which population and with what limitations. If the source cannot be verified, remove the claim or rewrite the passage so it does not depend on it.
Do not turn an invented example into a customer success story. Label illustrative examples explicitly, and publish client outcomes only when the evidence and permission are in place.
Protect the information behind the work
Use only information approved for the chosen tool and purpose. Check access, retention and data-use settings before introducing client or internal material. A public writing task rarely needs a full client file or internal strategy document.
Keep private methods, confidential figures and personal information out of public prompts and published outputs. Reducing the input to what the task actually needs also makes review easier.
Keep accountability clear
Name the person responsible for the final output. Their review should cover factual accuracy, relevance, brand consistency and whether the content answers the customer’s question. For decisions, they should also examine the assumptions and what evidence is missing.
A useful pilot has a defined output, an agreed quality standard and a point at which the team will continue, revise or stop. Evaluate error rates and total effort before expanding the workflow.
Use AI to support the whole picture
MACO’s work connects positioning, brand, intelligence and growth. AI belongs in that work when it serves a clear purpose and its contribution can be checked. Our measurement and decision-support approach is being developed and validated progressively; it should not be mistaken for a fully autonomous platform.
To discuss a practical starting point for your business, contact MACO.
Editorially reviewed: 22 October 2026. Source: NIST AI 600-1 (2024). The workflow recommendations are MACO editorial guidance, not a claim of NIST certification.
Add comment
Comments